Q: “I do not adhere to the approach
taken by the interviewers of the defendant.
Strong evidence has been provided that the confession obtained from the
defendant was under duress, particularly in relation to the time taken and the
heavy handed interrogation of the defendant as witnessed in the video viewed in
court this morning. Consequently, as the prosecution’s case relies heavily on
the confession provided by the defendant, the case is dismissed.”
The
purpose of conducting interviews in a forensic environment is to gather
specific information and facts from the suspect (AICPA, 2012). Interviewing is one of the most important
roles forensic accountants perform (McGimsey, 2015). They must be prepared for an interview by
knowing the evidence and facts of their case as best they can, having the right
questions ready to ask as well as being mentally ready are so crucial to get
admission from a suspect as the interviewer only gets one chance (Black, 2014).
In
my interviewing experience in the past I have been lucky in
regards to skipping the interview process in jobs. However, coming to the end of my degree, I will be looking to apply for
graduate positions. I am aware I will need to research the company, practice
answering all questions that may be asked and prepare myself mentally in order
to give me the best possible chance to get the job as I will most likely only
get one opportunity.
I
recommend no matter what technique the interviewer performs, they must always
remain objective and open minded in the interview (AICPA, 2010). I’d also personally recommend all
interviewers to;
- Have an interview plan, know it well.
- Build a rapport with the suspect, as this is to develop a good feeling to instil a level of trust (Bennett & Hess, 2004).
- Commence interview with open ended questions with a view to commit to stay of relation to the allegation.
Alternatively,
another approach is to use many other interviewing techniques available to get
admissibly from the suspect. These
include PEACE (fact-based/ ethical), REID (interrogation/accusatory) (House
& Snook, 2008), and motivational (psychotherapeutic) models. (Van Akkeren,
2015).
There
are also some ‘do nots’ in an interview, they are;
- Don’t conduct an interview without a plan.
- Don’t include personal opinions.
- Don’t promise or threaten the interviewee.
References
AICPA: Forensic and Valuation Services Section. (2012). Conducting
Effective Interviews. Retrieved from: http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ForensicAndValuation/Resources/PractAidsGuidance/DownloadableDocuments/10834-378_interview%20whiite%20paper-FINAL-v1.pdf
Bennett, W. & Hess, K.M. (2004). Rapport,
Active Listening, and other Techniques in Criminal Investigation, (7th Ed.).
Belmont, CA. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Ch7 pp.65.
Black, I.S. (2014).
Preparation and So Much More: The Art of Investigative Interviewing(3th
Ed.) (p. 19-27). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-411577-4.00003-4 (ch.3).
McGimsey, C. L.,
C.P.A./C.F.F., & Whelan, D., C.P.A. (2015). Forensic interviews: Plan to
succeed. Journal of
Accountancy, 220(2),
34-38,40-42. Retrieved from
http://gateway.library.qut.edu.au/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1702884673?accountid=13380
House, C.H. and Snook, B. (2008). An Alternative interviewing
method: All we are saying is give PEACE a chance. Retrieved from: http://www.cbc.ca/thenational/includes/pdf/snook-2008.pdf
Van Akkeren. J. (2015). AYB115: Governance, Fraud and Investigation:
Lecture 8 [slide 36]. Retrieved from:https://blackboard.qut.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_116816_1&content_id=_5376704_1&mode=reset
Additional
Information:
Forensics - Making a case. Interviewing suspects. Interrogation techniques (3 Parts):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNORT0s7YAY - Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcmK4IqMDG0 - Part 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdPXCFm9o6A - Part 3
Interview's do's and don'ts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1ucmfPOBV8
No comments:
Post a Comment